SHREE MODH PATNI GANCHI GNATI PANCH TRUST,SURAT vs. THE C.I.T. (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT should not have rejected the applications solely on the ground that charitable activities had not yet commenced. The focus at the initial stage should be on the genuineness of the objects.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected both applications for non-compliance and lack of charitable activities.
What were the issues?
Whether registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G(5) can be denied if charitable activities have not yet commenced, and if the CIT's inquiry should be limited to the genuineness of the objects at this stage.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Hardayal Charitable and Educational Trust v. CIT-II, Agra5 citing150 TTJ 384 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI O.P.MEENA
आदेश /O R D E R PER BHAVNESH SAINI, JM: Both the appeals by the assessee are directed against the different 1. orders of Learned CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad dated 29.12.2016 rejecting the application u/s.80G(5) and dated 26.12.2016 rejecting the application u/s.12AA of the Income Tax Act.
We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties 2. and perused the impugned orders.
Shree Modh Patni Ganchi Gnyati Trust Vs. CIT(Exe.), Ahd /ITA No’s.494 & 495/AHD/2017 Page 2 of 4
The Learned CIT(Exemptions) noted in the impugned orders that 3. assessee was asked to furnish the detailed note of activities actually carried out by the assessee trust and was also directed to file certain details and documents as are mentioned in the orders. It is further noted that the notices issued to the assessee were not responded to by the assessee. Therefore, both the applications were disposed of on the basis of material available on record.
The Learned CIT(Exemptions) also noted that assessee has neither 4. carried out any charitable / religious activities nor established Corpus to undertake the charitable activities. This clearly indicates that assessee does not have intention even to start charitable / religious activities. According to Section 12AA and Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, the Commissioner has to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the activities of the trust or institution and he has to verify the activities as per the objects. The Learned CIT(Exemptions) relied upon the order of ITAT Agra in the case of Hardayal Charitable and Educations Trust Vs. CIT-II, Agra, 150 TTJ 384 and accordingly dismissed the applications.
After considering rival submissions, we are of the view that the 5. matter requires reconsideration at the level of Learned CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad. The Learned CIT(Exemptions) rejected the claim of the
Shree Modh Patni Ganchi Gnyati Trust Vs. CIT(Exe.), Ahd /ITA No’s.494 & 495/AHD/2017 Page 3 of 4
assessee, because assessee did not carry out any charitable / religious activities and relied upon order of ITAT Agra Bench in the case of Hardayal Charitable and Educational Trust(supra). The aforesaid decision have been set-aside by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Hardayal Charitable and Educational Trust Vs. CIT, 355 ITR 532 in which it was held as under : “It was held that at the time of registration u/s 12AA, which was necessary for claiming exemption u/s 11 and 12, the CIT was not required to look into the activities, where such activities had not or were in the process of its initiation. Where a trust, set up to achieve its objects of establishing educational institution, was in the process of establishing such institutions, and receives donations, the registration u/s 12AA cannot be refused, on the ground that the Trust had not yet commenced the charitable or religious activity. Any enquiry of the nature would amount to putting the cart before the horse. At this stage only the genuineness of the objects had to be tasted and not the activities, which had not commenced. It was held that the enquiry of the CIT at such preliminary stage should be restricted to genuineness of the objects and not the activities unless such activities had commenced. The Trust or society could not claim exemption, unless it was registered u/s 12AA and thus at that such initial stage the test of the genuineness of the activity could not be a ground on which the registration may be refused.” The orders of the Learned CIT(Exemptions) thus cannot be 6. sustained in Law. No other reasons have been given in the orders except that assessee did not file certain required documents. Therefore, matter requires reconsideration on both the issues at the level of Learned CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad. We, accordingly set-aside the impugned orders and restore both the matters in issue to the file of the Learned CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad with a direction to re-decide both the
Shree Modh Patni Ganchi Gnyati Trust Vs. CIT(Exe.), Ahd /ITA No’s.494 & 495/AHD/2017 Page 4 of 4
applications u/s.12AA and 80G(5) of the Act as per Law by giving reasonable sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed for 7. statistical purpose.
The order pronounced in the open court 13-05-2019. 8.
Sd/- Sd/- (O.P.MEENA) (BHAVNESH SAINI) (लेखासद�यकेसम� /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (�याियकसद�यतथा/JUDICIAL MEMBER) सुरत/ Surat, �दनांक Dated: 13th May , 2019/S.Gangadhara Rao, Sr.PS Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / / TRUE COPY / / Assistant Registrar, Surat
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026