NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL AND DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 10(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that depreciation on goodwill acquired through a slump sale is allowable. It also found that the TPO's use of two different methods for benchmarking export transactions was not justifiable and directed the use of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM).
What were the facts?
The assessee company acquired a switchgear division through a slump sale and claimed depreciation on goodwill. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) made adjustments for export of finished goods and import of raw materials, using different methods for benchmarking.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the allowability of depreciation on goodwill acquired through a slump sale and the appropriateness of the transfer pricing methods and adjustments made by the TPO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 32,Section 92C,Section 92CA,Section 10(3)(1),Section 143(3),Section 144C(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.540 citing348 ITR 302 · 2012 · SC
- Fisher Scientific India (P) Ltd. v. D Fisher Scientific India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT7 citing155 Taxmann.com 346 · 2023
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
Navateur Electricals and Digital systems Pvt. Ltd. AY 2012-13 PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These two cross appeals filed by assessee and revenue are against the order of CIT (A)-57, Mumbai, vide order no. CIT(A)(A)-57/Arr. 265/2019-20, dated 29.11.2019 passed against the assessment order by Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10(3)(1), Mumbai, u/s. 143(3)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Doms Industries Ltd, Valsad vs PCIT, ValsadITA 595/SRT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Aeon Formulations Private Limited, Chennai vs Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1)…ITA 2481/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 9186/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9185/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026