No AI summary yet for this case.
$~1, 2, 22 to 27, 33 & 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 662/2023 & CM APPL. 61095/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (2)
+ ITA 665/2023 & CM APPL. 61183/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (22) + ITA 647/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (23) + ITA 648/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (24) + ITA 649/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (25
+ ITA 650/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus ITA 662/2023 & connected matters
Page 1 of 3 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 13:11:37
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (26) + ITA 654/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (27) + ITA 655/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (33) + ITA 793/2023, CM APPL. 66319/2023 & 66320/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent (35) + ITA 795/2023, CM APPL. 66332/2023 & 66333/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant
versus
M/S KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.
..... Respondent
Present : Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Hemlata Rawat, Advocate for Appellant/revenue. Mr Rohit Jain and Mr Saksham Singhal, Advocates for Respondent/assessee.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R %
20.12.2023
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] 1. Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, appearing on ITA 662/2023 & connected matters
Page 2 of 3 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 13:11:37
behalf of the appellant/revenue, says that the above-captioned appeals could not have been instituted in this court in view of the fact that the Officer who framed the assessment order is located in Karnal. 1.1 In this behalf, Mr Sanjay Kumar draws our attention to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case titled Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh versus ABC Papers Limited (2022) 9 SCC-1. 2. Mr Rohit Jain, learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondent/assessee, does not dispute this position. 2.1 Accordingly, the above-captioned appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellant/revenue to approach the appropriate court as per law. 3. Needless to add, in case the appellant/revenue seeks to prosecute the matter against the respondent/assessee, appropriate steps would be taken at the earliest, though not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of the order passed today. 4. Consequently, pending applications have been rendered infructuous. 5. The said applications are, accordingly, closed.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J DECEMBER 20, 2023 MS
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
ITA 662/2023 & connected matters
Page 3 of 3
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 13:11:37