NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the six-month limit from the commencement of activities is not applicable to institutions that had already commenced their activities before obtaining provisional approval. The application was considered within the time limit as it was filed before the expiry of the provisional approval.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an established charitable institution, applied for regular approval under Section 80G after obtaining provisional approval. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application as belated, citing the six-month limit from the commencement of activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for regular approval under Section 80G was filed within the prescribed time limit, considering the institution had prior provisional approval and had commenced activities long ago.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing131 ITR 597 · 1981 · SC
- Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association328 citing2 Taxmann 501 · 1980 · SC
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 27.03.2025, impugned herein, passed by the CIT (Exemptions) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2026-27. 2. In this case, the Assessee by filing an application in Form 10AB on dated 30.09.2024 under clause (iii) of 1st Proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act had sought for approval u/s 80G of the Act on the ground that the Assessee has obtained provisional approval u/s 80G of the Act vide ord
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026