Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 777/2023 & CM APPL. 65410/2023
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7..... Appellant Through: Ms Pratishtha Chaudhary, proxy counsel for Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.
versus
UNITECH ACACIA PROJECTS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R %
18.12.2023
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 65411/2023 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ITA 777/2023 & CM APPL. 65410/2023 2. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13. 3. Via the instant appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 29.03.2023, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short “Tribunal”]. 4. Via the impugned order, the Tribunal sustained the order dated 30.10.2019, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short “CIT(A)”]. 5. Via the said penalty order, the respondent/assessee has been mulcted with a penalty amounting to Rs.1,95,69,800/-. Apparently, the penalty was ITA 777/2023
Page 1 of 2 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:50:24
levied, because inaccurate particulars concerning late deposit and late payment of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) had been furnished. 6. The record discloses that there was late payment of TDS amounting to Rs.5,99,09,832/-. Insofar as the late deposit of TDS was concerned, the amount was pegged at Rs.1,22,09,703/-. 7. The Assessing Officer [in short, “AO”] made additions on account of aforesaid amounts; however, the CIT(A), via order dated 30.03.2017, while confirming the addition of Rs.5,99,09,832/-, scaled down the addition with regard to the other amount i.e., Rs.1,22,09703/- to Rs. 4,07,000/-. 8. The notice issued to the respondent/assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short “Act”] has not been placed on record. 8.1 We would like learned counsel for the appellant/revenue to place the notice on record. 9. Meanwhile, notice shall be issued to the respondent/assessee regarding the interlocutory application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 10. Accordingly, list the above-captioned matter on 15.03.2024.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J DECEMBER 18, 2023 MS
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
ITA 777/2023
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:50:24