PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 vs. GREEN MARK INFRA LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the current appeal, finding it similar to previously dismissed appeals. The delay in re-filing the appeal was condoned.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed against an ITAT order that recalled its previous order. The revenue's appeals for subsequent assessment years, based on the same ITAT order, were previously dismissed by the High Court.
What were the issues?
Whether the current appeal is maintainable given the dismissal of similar appeals for other assessment years based on the same ITAT order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 118/2023 & CM No.9911/2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
..... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr Standing Counsel.
versus
GREEN MARK INFRA LTD.
..... Respondent Through: Dr Rakesh Gupta, Mr Somil Agarwal and Mr Anshul Mittal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R %
01.03.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM No.9911/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 134 days in re-filing the appeal] 1. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal. 1.1 According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 134 days. 2. Dr Rakesh Gupta, who appears on behalf of the respondent/assessee, says that he does not oppose the prayer made in the application. 3. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. 4. The application is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.
ITA 118/2023
page 1 of 2 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:24:59
ITA 118/2023 5. This appeal is directed against the order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”]. 5.1 The Tribunal via the impugned order has recalled its order dated 26.10.2018 passed in ITA No.6206/Del/2015 and Cross Objections (CO)No.398/Del/2015 concerning Assessment year (AY) 2007-08. 6. We are told that insofar as the appellant/revenue’s appeal and the respondents/assessee’s cross-objections for AYs 2008-09 and 2009-10 are concerned, they were also disposed of via the very same order passed by the Tribunal, i.e., order dated 26.10.2018. 7. Mr Sanjay Kumar, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, says that against the very same order concerning AYs 2008-09 and 2009-10, appeals were preferred with this court. The said appeals were numbered as ITA Nos. 79/2023 and 78/2023. The said appeals, for the reasons given in the order dated 13.02.2023, were dismissed. 8. Having regard to the same and for the reasons given in the order dated 13.02.2023, the instant appeal is also dismissed. 9. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MARCH 1, 2023
Click here to check corrigendum, if any ITA 118/2023
page 2 of 2 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:24:59
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026