THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 vs. CHETAN GUPTA

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 217 / 2023HC Delhi17 April 20232 pages
For Petitioner: RUCHIR BHATIA
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court has framed a question of law regarding the ITAT's decision to reverse the CIT(A)'s addition. This addition was based on peak credit in individual accounts versus the entire year.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed the ITAT's order for AY 2006-2007, which followed previous orders for AYs 2001-2005. The appeal concerns unexplained credits found in the assessee's books.

What were the issues?

Whether the ITAT was justified in reversing the CIT(A)'s addition based on peak credit calculation for unexplained credits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 217/2023

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1

..... Appellant Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Priya Sarkar and Mr Shlok Chandra, Jr. Standing Counsel.

versus

CHETAN GUPTA

..... Respondent

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

HON'BLE MS JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R %

17.04.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] ITA 217/2023 1. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2006-2007. 2. The appellant/revenue has assailed the order dated 28.07.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”]. The Tribunal, in reaching its conclusion, has followed its order concerning the respondent/assessee for AYs 2001-2002 to 2004-2005. 3. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, informs us that appeals have been filed against the said order of the Tribunal. In this connection, one of the orders passed in ITA 23/2019 dated 02.03.2021 has been brought to our notice.

ITA 217/2023

page 1 of 2

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:16:10

3.1 Mr Bhatia says, that the question of law framed and as reflected in the order would also be applicable in this case. The question of law framed in ITA 23/2019 reads as follows: “Whether the ITAT was justified in reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT (A)] whereby the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 qua the unexplained credits found in the books of the Respondent-Assessee [contained in the pen drive] was based on the peak credit in the individual accounts and not on the peak credit for the entire year in question?” 4. Issue notice to the respondent/assessee via all modes, including e- mail. 5. List the matter on 31.10.2023.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

APRIL 17, 2023 / tr

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

ITA 217/2023

page 2 of 2

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:16:10

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →