Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 39/2023 & CM No.2671/2023
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2
..... Appellant Through: Ms Easha Kadian, Adv. for Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel.
versus
LS CABLE AND SYSTEM PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: Ms Ananya Kapoor, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R %
20.01.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM No.2671/2023 1. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal. 1.1 According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 120 days. 2. Ms Ananya Kapoor, who appears on behalf of the respondent/assessee, says that she does not oppose the prayer made in the application. 3. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. 4. The application is disposed of.
ITA 39/2023
page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:33:06
ITA 39/2023 5. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2015-2016. 6. The order impugned is dated 13.04.2022. This order has been passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short “Tribunal”]. 7. Ms Easha Kadian, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, concedes that the issue raised in the appeal concerning AY 2014-2015 stands covered by the decision of this Court dated 01.10.2018 passed in ITA No.781/2018. 8. Ms Kadian also informs us, that the very same issue between the parties was decided by the coordinate bench of this Court in a bunch of appeals via judgment dated 30.09.2011, in which the lead appeal was ITA No.706/2011, titled Director of Income Tax v. L.S. Cables Ltd. We are told, that the name of the respondent has now been changed to LS Cable & System Pvt. Ltd. 9. We are in, respectful, agreement with the view taken by the coordinate benches of this Court. 10. Accordingly, the instant appeal is closed, as no substantial question of law arises for consideration in the instant appeal.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
JANUARY 20, 2023
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
ITA 39/2023
page 2 of 2 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:33:06