THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. SHANGRI-LA INTERNATIONAL HOTEL MANAGEMENT PTE LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the reimbursement of expenses for marketing, frequent flyer, frequent guest, and reservation fees cannot be treated as fees for technical services. The court noted that this issue was covered by previous judgments.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against a Tribunal order holding that reimbursement of marketing, frequent flyer, frequent guest, and reservation fees received by the assessee were not fees for technical services. This issue was related to Assessment Years 2019-20 and 2018-19.
What were the issues?
Whether reimbursement of certain expenses constitutes fees for technical services under the Income Tax Act and the Indo-Singapore DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Director of Income Tax v. Sheraton International Inc.48 citing178 Taxmann 84 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
$~46 & 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 532/2023 + ITA 535/2023 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3
..... Appellant Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr Standing Counsel with Ms Deeksha Gupta, ssssAdv.
versus
SHANGRI-LA INTERNATIONAL HOTEL MANAGEMENT PTE LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Mr Manuj Sabharwal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R %
18.09.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM Appl.47914/2023 in ITA 532/2023 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ITA 532/2023 ITA 535/2023 2. These appeals concern Assessment Years (AYs) 2019-20 [ITA 532/2023] and 2018-19 [ITA 535/2023]. 3. In the above captioned appeals, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail a common order dated 28.02.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”]. 4. Broadly, the Tribunal, via the impugned order, has ruled that the reimbursement of expenses qua marketing fees, frequent flyer programme,
ITA Nos.532/2023 & 535/2023
1/2 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:32:40
frequent guest programme and reservation fees received by the respondent/assessee cannot be treated as fee for technical services, in terms of Article 12(4) of the Indo-Singapore DTAA and under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, “Act”]. 5. Concededly, this issue stands covered by the following judgments: (i) DIT vs. Sheraton International Inc. (2009), 178 Taxmann 84 (Del.) (ii) CIT vs. Sheraton International Inc. [decided by this court on 11.05.2023 in ITA 271/2023] (iii) CIT vs. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. 2022:DHC:004730. 6. Therefore, according to us, no substantial questions law arises for consideration. 7. The appeals are accordingly closed. 8. Needless to add, since the appellant/revenue has preferred a Special Leave Petition against the judgment rendered by this court in CIT v Sheraton International Inc., parties will abide by the final decision rendered in that case by the Supreme Court.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
SEPTEMBER 18, 2023/pmc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
ITA Nos.532/2023 & 535/2023
2/2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:32:40
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)
- Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V., Netherlands vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New…ITA 1948/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1697/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1696/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8… vs Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., PuneITA 2150/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026