← Back to search

KHUSHI EDUCATIONAL & SOCIAL TRUST,MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 4470/MUM/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 September 20254 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI () & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA ()

Hearing: 09.09.2025Pronounced: 30.09.2025

Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.:

The present appeal filed by the assessee arises out of order dated 25/06/2025 passed by Ld. CIT(E), Mumbai for assessment year 2024-25 on following grounds of appeal :
“1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the leaned
CIT (Exemption) erred in not granting registration u/s 80G[5] of ITA, 1961, and rejecting the Application for the same just because

2
ITA No.4470/Mum/2025; A.Y. 2024-25
Khushi Educational & Social Trust a wrong option of fresh certificate was selected instead of renewal of the said certificate that too without granting an opportunity rectify the clerical error.”
Brief facts of the case are as under:
2. The assessee is trust and is engaged in building an educated, socially aware, self-reliant and healthy society. "To dutifully serve the society that we live in, is true social service."
Khushi Trust is the result of coming together of social conscious persons who firmly believe in this ideology. Khushi Educational &
Social Trust (SNSBCT) is registered as a Trust under Bombay
Public Trust Act 1950 with Charity Commissioner, Mumbai.
2.1 It is approved under Section 12A up to 31-3-26 and u/s 80G provisional approval was granted upto 31-3-2024. It applied for renewal of 80G approval on 10/5/2024 which was within time, but the application was rejected on the grounds that the application was made with wrong section 80G(5)(iv)(B). Hence a curative application was filed on 29/11/2024 under Section 80G(5)(iii).
2.2 However, the said application was rejected citing late filing, ignoring the submissions made. It was submitted that, selection of wrong Section is no ground to reject application u/s 80G. It was submitted that, there was no delay in filing application as the first application was filed in time and 2nd application was a curative one to correct the Selection of wrong Section in first application.
3. The Ld.AR submitted that, the assessee being an old trust it had to apply for renewal of 80G u/s. 80G(5)(iii) as against
80G(v)(iv)(b). He thus submitted that the registration u/s.12A is 3
ITA No.4470/Mum/2025; A.Y. 2024-25
Khushi Educational & Social Trust available to the assessee and relied on the decision of Coordinate
Mumbai in ITA No. 6133/Mum/2024, vide order dated
09/01/2025 wherein identical issue was considered.
On the contrary, the Ld.DR relied on the orders passed by the authorities below.
We have perused the submissions advance by both sides in the light of record placed before us.
4. It is noted that the assessee is admittedly an old trust having a valid registration under section 12A and 80G.
4.1 It is noted that while filing Form for final registration in Form 10AB has inadvertently mentioned the wrong section as sub- clause (B) of clause (iv) of first proviso to subsection (5) of section 80G instead of clause (iii) of first proviso to subsection (5) of section 80G
4.2 From the perusal of provisions applicable to the facts of present case, in our considered view, there is merit in claim of the Ld. AR that assessee has selected the wrong section code inadvertently while filing the application for final registration in Form 10AB.
4.3 In view of these, we remit the issue back to the file of Ld.CIT(E), with a direction to consider the application under Clause (iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, and to decide the application of the assessee for final approval as possible before the expiry of the provisional approval granted in order to enable the assessee to have the benefit of section 80G without any break.

4
ITA No.4470/Mum/2025; A.Y. 2024-25
Khushi Educational & Social Trust

Accordingly the grounds raised by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30/09/2025 (OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA)
Judicial Member
Mumbai:
Dated: 30/09/2025
Poonam Mirashi,
Stenographer
Copy of the order forwarded to:
(1)The Appellant
(2) The Respondent
(3) The CIT
(4) The CIT (Appeals)
(5) The DR, I.T.A.T.By order

(Asstt.

KHUSHI EDUCATIONAL & SOCIAL TRUST,MUMBAI vs CIT(EXEMPTION), MUMBAI | BharatTax