NUTRELA MARKETING P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 7(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 50C is applicable only to land or building or both, and not to leasehold rights. However, it followed a subsequent Bombay High Court decision which applied Section 50C to leasehold rights, dismissing the assessee's grounds.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed bad debts and sold leasehold rights in land and a factory building. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 50C, treating the stamp duty valuation as the sale consideration for capital gains. The CIT(A) upheld the addition but restricted it to the stamp duty value.
What were the issues?
Whether Section 50C of the Income Tax Act is applicable to the transfer of leasehold rights in land and building, and whether the Tribunal should follow a High Court decision that contradicts its own interpretation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.192 citing389 ITR 68 · 2016 · HC
- GVK Industries Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer119 citing197 Taxmann 337 · 2015 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Mother India Refrigeration Industries (P.) Ltd.47 citing155 ITR 711 · 1985 · SC
- Atul G. Puranik v. ITO43 citing132 ITD 499 · 2011 · ITAT
- CIT v. Amarchand N. Shroff40 citing48 ITR 59 · 1963 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA
Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.: The present appeal filed by the assessee arises out of order dated 01/02/2019 passed under miscellaneous petition no. 483/Mum/2018. 2. It is submitted that, this Tribunal vide dated 10/01/2018 dismissed the appeal for non appearance. However, on going
2 ITA No.3910/Mum/2010; A.Y. 2006-07 Nutrela Marketing Pvt Ltd through the affidavit filed by the assessee, in miscellaneous petition, the order dated 10/01/2018 was recalled and posted to decide the appeal on merits after hearing appeal on both sides.
Accordingly the present appeal is been placed before this Tribunal
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 50C
- M N S Barium Salts, Kadapa vs ITO, Ward-1, KadapaITA 2412/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sawalchand Chunilal Bafna HUF, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer-16(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7492/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Rohini Ramhari Bhadale, Pune vs Assessing Officer Ward 2(2) Pune, PuneITA 2767/PUN/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Sweta Somani, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 44(2), KolkataITA 1656/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026