ISPAT EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18 NEW DELHI
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issue is covered by Supreme Court and Delhi High Court judgments. The appeal was listed for further hearing to allow the appellant to distinguish these judgments.
What were the facts?
The appellant, a thrift and credit society, was denied deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest earned on fixed deposits. This interest was generated from a portion of its net profits compulsorily transferred to a reserve fund.
What were the issues?
Whether interest earned on compulsory reserve fund investments by a thrift and credit society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO486 citing188 Taxmann 282 · 2010 · SC
- Mantola Co-operative Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT242 citing50 Taxmann.com 278 · 2014 · HC · Read judgment
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 74/2023, CM Nos.6315/2023 & 6418/2023
ISPAT EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.
..... Appellant
Through: Mr Salil Kapoor, Advocate.
versus
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18 NEW DELHI
..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R %
03.03.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM No.6418/2023 1. Allowed, subject to the appellant filing legible copies of the annexures, at least three days before the next date of hearing. ITA 74/2023 & CM Nos.6315/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 311 days in re-filing the appeal] 2. The appellant is a thrift and credit society. The appellant has been denied deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, “the Act”]. 3. Mr Salil Kapoor, who appears on behalf of the appellant, says that deduction ought to have been given, in view of the fact that the appellant was compulsorily required to carry 1/4th of its net profits to the reserve fund. 3.1 It is Mr Kapoor’s contention that it is this amount which was invested ITA 74/2023
page 1 of 2 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:04:01
in fixed deposits. It is this interest [which was earned on fixed deposits] which has been treated by the Assessing Officer (AO) as not being deductible under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. 4. Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent/revenue, says that this issue is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in Totgars’ Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. v. Income Tax officer, Karnataka (2010) 188 Taxmann 282 (SC) and the judgment of the coordinate bench of this court in Mantola Co- Operative Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax (2014) 50 Taxmann.com 278 (Delhi). 4.1. We are told that the Mantola case is pending in the Supreme Court and that the SLP has been converted to a Civil Appeal i.e., C.A.666 of 2016. 5. Mr Kapoor, on the other hand, seeks to distinguish the aforementioned judgments. 6. Accordingly, list the appeal on 28.04.2023.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MARCH 3, 2023 / tr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
ITA 74/2023
page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:04:01
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026