VIPUL MOHANLAL JOSHI,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 42(1)(5), MUMBAI
ITA 2384/MUM/2025Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 October 2025AY 2013-14Bench: the Ld. CIT(A) and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments.7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.2384/Mum/2025 is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 13th day of October 2025.1 pages
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Vipul Mohanlal Joshi assessee to present its submissions and evidence. Accordingly, the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is set aside to his file for fresh adjudication on all grounds, including the additional legal grounds admitted herein. The assessee shall cooperate in the proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A) and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026