LEKHRAJ JASRAJ JAIN ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 19(2)(1), MUMBAI

PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (J.M.): 1. The appeal is filed by the appellant/assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [referred as Ld. CIT(A)], Lekhraj Jasraj Jain Mumbai dated 10.06.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Act for AY 2014-15 wherein the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. 2. At the outset, our attention was drawn towards letter dated 25.09.2025 wherein the assessee has requested to withdraw the appeal. The operative portion of the letter extracted as under:- “The captioned appeal has been fixed for hearing on 01.10.2025 before your honours. In this regard, the appellant submits that: The appellant had inadvertently filed two appeals against the order of Ld. CIT(A), NFAC u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), dated 10.06.2025, wherein the Ld. NFAC had upheld the assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, dated 28.12.2017. The relevant details of the said appeals are as under: Appeal No. Bench Date of Filing Case Status „A‟ Bench 18.07.2025 Fixed for hearing on 14 October, 2025 „A‟ Bench 06.08.2025 Heard on 3oth September, 2025 The appellant humbly prays that as the appeal bearing ITA No. 4937/Mum/2025 has been heard by the Hon'ble 'A' Bench on 30.09.2025, the appellant be granted leave to withdraw the appeal bearing ITA No. 4583/Mum/2025. For this act of kindness, the appellant shall be grateful.” Lekhraj Jasraj Jain 3. On the other hand, Ld. DR did not object to the said request of withdrawal. 4. Considering the contents of the letter as mentioned above, we allow the request of the assessee for withdrawing the present appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 15.10.2025 (OM PRAKASH KANT) (RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Mumbai / Dated 15.10.2025 Dhananjay, Sr.PS

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

(Asstt.