SURJIT SINGH AMRIK SINGH SAINI ,MUMBAI vs. DICT,CIRCLE 27(3), MUMBAI , MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAILSHRI PRABHASH SHANKARSurjit Singh Amrik Singh Saini, Chacha House, Chembur Mumbai – 400071, Maharashtra PAN: ALZPS4719C
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M.
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the impugned order dated 07/03/2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(“the Act”) by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National
Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year
2018-19. 2. In this appeal, the assessee has filed a letter dated 08/09/2025 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal on the basis that the tax dispute for the 2
year under consideration has been settled under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2024 and the order for full and final settlement in Form no.4 has been issued by the Designated Authority after payment of tax arrears by the assessee.
Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee.
Having perused the letter dated 08/09/2025 filed by the assessee and the supporting documents, we accept the request of the assessee for the withdrawal of the present appeal.
In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 15/10/2025 PRABHASH SHANKAR
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
JUDICIAL MEMBER
MUMBAI, DATED: 15/10/2025
Prabhat
Copy of the order forwarded to:
(1)
The Assessee;
(2)
The Revenue;
(3)
The PCIT / CIT (Judicial);
(4)
The DR, ITAT, Mumbai; and (5)
Guard file.
By Order