Facts
The assessee's application for approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act was rejected by the CIT(E) on the ground that its application for registration under Section 12AB of the Act was rejected. However, the order rejecting the Section 12AB registration was subsequently set aside by the Tribunal.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the Coordinate Bench had directed the CIT(E) to reconsider the Section 12AB application. Therefore, the impugned order rejecting the Section 80G approval was restored to the CIT(E) for reconsideration.
Key Issues
Whether the rejection of Section 80G approval is valid when the basis for rejection (Section 12AB rejection) has been set aside by the Tribunal and requires reconsideration?
Sections Cited
80G, 12AB, 1961
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & MS. PADMAVATHY S
O R D E R
Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President:
This is an appeal by the assessee challenging the order dated 25.06.2025 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [in short the ‘CIT(E)], Mumbai rejecting assessee’s application seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short the ‘Act’).
We have heard learned counsel appearing for the assessee and learned Departmental Representative (DR) and perused the materials on record. Notably, assesee’s application seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Act has been rejected solely on the ground that the application filed by the assessee seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act has been rejected vide order dated 25.06.2025. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the order passed by learned CIT(E) rejecting assessee’s application seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act, in the meanwhile, has been set aside by the Tribunal while deciding assessee’s appeal in vide order dated 27.10.2025. A copy of the said order was placed on record. On perusal of the aforesaid order of the Coordinate Bench, we find the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the assessee to be correct. Since, the Coordinate Bench has directed learned CIT(E) to reconsider assessee’s application seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act afresh, the impugned order rejecting assessee’s application seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Act deserves to be restored back to learned CIT(E) for reconsideration, depending upon the out-come of the application seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act.
Needless to mention, before taking any decision assessee must be provided reasonable opportunity of being heard.
In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29 /10/2025.