Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 169/2023
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI
..... Appellant Through: Mr Abhishek Maratha, Sr Standing Counsel.
versus
NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R %
22.03.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM Appl.13593/2023 1. This is an application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal. 2. According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 115 days. 3. For the reasons given, and having regard to the period of delay involved in the application, we are inclined to condone the delay. 3.1 It is ordered accordingly. 4. The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
ITA 169/2023
1/3
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:00:41
CM Appl.13592/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal] 5. This is an application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 6. According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 98 days.
For the reasons given, and having regard to the period of delay involved in the application, we are inclined to condone the delay. 7.1 It is ordered accordingly. 8. The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ITA 169/2023 9. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14. 10. The core issue, which arises for consideration in the present appeal, according to the appellant/revenue is: (i) Whether the charitable activities carried out by the respondent/assessee constitute trade, commerce and business? 11. According to the appellant/revenue, these are not charitable activities, and thus, fall within the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, the “Act”], and hence, the exemption under Section 11 of the Act is not available. 12. It is not disputed, that this very issue has been decided in favour of the respondent/assessee, and against the appellant/revenue, by this Court via the judgment dated 30.04.2019 rendered in ITA 133/2019, titled Commissioner of Income Tax –Exemption vs. National Internet Exchange of India.
ITA 169/2023
2/3 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:00:41
12.1 It is evident from the record, that insofar as AY 2010-11 is concerned, even in that case, the judgment has been rendered in favour of the respondent/assessee. This judgment is dated 12.02.2019, and has been passed in ITA 145/2019, titled Commissioner of Income Tax-Exemption v. National Internet Exchange of India. 13. We are told, that a Special Leave Petition (SLP) has been filed qua the aforesaid judgments rendered by the coordinate bench of this Court, which has been converted into a Civil Appeal, and is pending adjudication. 14. For this purpose, our attention has been drawn to Annexure-A/5 (Colly). 15. Accordingly, the appeal is closed, as no substantial question of law arises for our consideration. 16. Needless to state, in case the appellant/revenue were to succeed in the pending Civil Appeal before the Supreme Court, it will have liberty to approach the Court, for reopening the appeals. 17. The Registry is directed to dispatch a copy of the order passed today to the respondent/assessee.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MARCH 22, 2023/pmc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
ITA 169/2023
3/3
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:00:41