ACIT-6(1)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. NIRJALA TELEHOLDINGS LTD, THANE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that, due to the statutory moratorium under Section 14(1) of the IBC, it is legally restrained from entertaining or proceeding with the appeals against the corporate debtor. Consequently, the appeals are dismissed in limine, with liberty for the Revenue to seek restoration once the moratorium ceases or appropriate permissions are obtained.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against assessment orders for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08 passed by the NFAC. However, the respondent company has been admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the IBC is in effect, suspending all proceedings against the corporate debtor.
What were the issues?
Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal can proceed with appeals against a corporate debtor when it is under a moratorium imposed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 7,Section 7(5),Section 14,Section 14(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M):
These two appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against separate impugned orders, both dated 10 December 2024, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, pertaining to the assessments framed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. 2. At the threshold of hearing, the learned Departmental Representative drew our attention to the significant respondent-company, Nirjala Teleholdings Limited, has been admitted into the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by an order of the Hon’ble National Company
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 7
- Reliance Home Finance Limited, Lower Parel… vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-8…ITA 1759/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jaiprakash Associates Limited vs The Office of the Commissioner of Customs…W.P.(C)-10387/20262 Sept 2026
- DCIT, C-4(1), Chandigarh vs M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd, ChandigarhITA 886/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed19 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd., Chandigarh vs ACIT, C-4(1), ChandigarhITA 571/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed19 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
- ACIT, Chandigarh vs M/S Winsome Yarn Ltd., ChandigarhITA 31/CHANDI/2010[2006-07]Status: Disposed19 Mar 2026AY 2006-07
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026