DCIT CC 7(2).MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. MAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that the assessee was entitled to depreciation on capitalized withholding tax as the possibility of refund was speculative.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made by the AO. The additions related to disallowance of interest on ECB, disallowance under Section 14A, and depreciation on capitalized withholding tax.
What were the issues?
Whether interest on ECB was deductible, whether Section 14A applies, and whether depreciation on capitalized withholding tax is allowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(a)(ia),Section 14A,Section 194A(3)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd.421 citing95 Taxmann.com 250 · 2018 · SC
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Standard Polygraph Machines (P.) Ltd.14 citing124 Taxmann 669 · 2002 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) – 49, Mumbai [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2020-21, raising following grounds:
Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CTT(A) erred in permitting the deduction of interest on ECB amounting to Rs. 1,35.71,435/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, without considering the payment of interest on the ECB to the Man Industries (India) Ltd Man Industries (India) Ltd section 194A(iii)(a) of the Act section 194A(iii)(a) of the Act
Whether. on the facts and circumsta
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026