DR. PREM SARAN,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI.

PDF · subscribers
ITA 38/GTY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati18 December 2019AY 1993-942 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal decided to restore the appeals back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits. The assessee was directed to appear before the CIT(A) by a specific date.

What were the facts?

The appeals were filed by the assessee against ex parte orders passed by the CIT(A). The tribunal noted that there was no clear indication of whether the assessee was properly served with the notice of hearing.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex parte orders passed by the CIT(A) were valid without proper service of notice to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GAUHATI BENCH “E” COURT AT KOLKATA

Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL GAUHATI BENCH “E” COURT AT KOLKATA Before Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member and Dr. A.L.Saini, Accountant Member ITA No.38 & 55/Gau/2018 Assessment Years :1993-94 & 1992-93 Dr. Prem Saran V/s. Asst. Commissioner H.No.1, Bagheswari Path, of Income Tax, Near Bagheswari mandir, Circle-1, Aayakar Dilip Huzuri Path, Bhawan,G.S.Road, Sorumotoria, Dispure, Christian Bati, Guwahati-781006 Guwahati-781005 [PAN No.AWCPS 4596 H] .. अपीलाथ� /Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent Shri D.K.Biswas, Advocate आवेदक क� ओर से/By Assessee Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT-DR राज�व क� ओर से/By Revenue 11-12-2019 सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing 18-12-2019 घोषणा क� तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R PER BEMCH:- These two assessee’s appeals for assessment year(s) 1993-94 & 1992- 93 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1 Guwahati’s separate orders all dated 22.12.2017 passed in case Nos. Guwa-09/2002-03/ &Guwa-10/2002-03134 involving proceedings u/s 143 r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file(s) perused. 2. It transpires during the course of hearing that the CIT(A)’s order(s) under challenge have been passed ex parte against the assessee. The Revenue’s case before us is that he has considered all factual and legal aspects in his speaking order(s) under challenge. We find that there is no indication in either of the two lower appellate order(s) as to whether the

ITA No.38 & 55/Gau/2018 A.Ys: 93-94 & 92-93 Dr. Prem Saran. Vs. ACIT, Cir-1, Guwa Page 2 assessee had been actually served the relevant notice of hearing or not. We therefore deem it appropriate in larger interest of justice that all the issue(s) raised in both these appeal(s) deserve to be restored back to the CIT(A) for afresh adjudication on merits. We order accordingly. The assessee shall appear himself or by his authorized representative before the CIT(A) on or before 30.04.2020 alongwith a copy of this order for further proceedings failing which our instant remand direction shall vacated.

3.

These two assessee’s appeals ITA No.38/Gau/2018 & ITA No.55/Gau/2018 are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. A copy of the instant common order be place in the respective case file(s). Order pronounced in the open court 18/12/2019 Sd/- Sd/- (A.L.Saini) (S.S.Godara) (Accountant Member) Judicial Member) Kolkata, *Dkp "दनांकः- 18/12/2019 कोलकाता/। आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. आवेदक /Assessee-Dr. Prem Saran H.No.1,Bagheswari Path, Nr. Bagheswari Mandir Dilip Huzuri Path,Sorumotoria, Dispur, Guwahati-781006 2. राज�व /Revenue-ACIT, Circle-1, Aayakar Bhawan, G.S. Road, Christian Basti, Guwahati-781005 3. संबं-धत आयकर आयु/त / Concerned CIT Guwahati 4. आयकर आयु/त- अपील / CIT (A) Guwahati 5. 2वभागीय �5त5न-ध, आयकर अपील�य अ-धकरण, / DR, ITAT, Guwahati 6. गाड9 फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से, /True Copy/ Sr. Private Secretary, Head of Office/DDO आयकर अपील�य अ-धकरण, गूवाहाठ� ।

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →