Facts
The assessee challenged an order passed by the CIT(A). The assessee did not appear for hearings despite notices. The Assessing Officer made disallowances under section 36(1)(iii) for diverting interest-bearing funds as interest-free loans to related parties.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the assessee repeatedly failed to appear and cooperate. The CIT(A)'s findings were upheld as no new evidence was presented to rebut them. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A)'s order can be sustained when the assessee failed to appear and present their case, and whether the disallowance for diversion of interest-bearing funds was justified.
Sections Cited
250, 143(3), 36(1)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN& SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��थ� / The Respondent. 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / The CIT(A) 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / Concerned CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,मु�बई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6.
आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, स�ािपत �ित //True Copy//
उप/सहायक पंजीकार ( Asst. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मु�बई मु�बई / ITAT, Mumbai मु�बई मु�बई