BALKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2, MUBMAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT () & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL () Assessment Year: 2021-22
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
This appeal, filed by the assessee, is directed against the order dated 30.03.2025 passed by the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Mumbai–2 (“Ld. PCIT”) under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), whereby the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer for Assessment Year 2021–22 was set aside for fresh examination.
At the commence assessee submitted issued under section been completed and relief therein. It was wish to pursue the withdraw the same. 2.1 In view of the assessee, and there request for withdraw been rendered infruc 3. In the result, th infructuous. Order pronoun (KAVITHA RA JUDICIAL M Mumbai; Dated: 10/12/2025 Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S. Ba ITA ement of hearing, the learned that, pursuant to the revisi n 263 of the Act, a fresh assess the assessee has already obtain therefore submitted that the as e present appeal and seeks aforesaid statement made on e being no objection from the wal is accepted. Consequently, ctuous and is dismissed as such he appeal of the assessee is ced in the open Court . - AJAGOPAL) (OM PRAK MEMBER ACCOUNTA alkrishna Industries Ltd 2 A No. 3588/MUM/2025 counsel for the ional directions sment has since ned the requisite ssessee does not permission to n behalf of the e Revenue, the the appeal has h. s dismissed as /- KASH KANT) ANT MEMBER
Copy of the Order forward
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent.
3. CIT
4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
5. Guard file.
////
Ba
ITA ded to :
BY ORDER
(Assistant Re
ITAT, Mu alkrishna Industries Ltd
3
A No. 3588/MUM/2025
R, gistrar) umbai