FAITHFULL DEVELOPERS ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIR-20(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 43CB, mandating the percentage completion method, is applicable to real estate business from AY 2017-18 onwards. While confirming the AO's action of applying Section 43CB, the Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the estimated profits after considering the assessee's submissions regarding errors in the calculation.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the CIT(A)'s order confirming additions made by the AO for the assessment year 2018-19. The additions were based on the estimated business profit computed under Section 43CB of the Act using the percentage completion method, which the assessee contended was not applicable to their real estate business.
What were the issues?
Whether Section 43CB of the Income Tax Act, mandating the percentage completion method, is applicable to real estate business? Whether the AO correctly computed the estimated business profit under Section 43CB?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN& SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��थ� / The Respondent. 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / The CIT(A) 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / Concerned CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,मु�बई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6.
आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, स�ािपत �ित //True Copy//
उप/सहायक पंजीकार ( Asst. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मु�बई मु�बई / ITAT, Mumbai मु�बई मु�बई
More judgments on Section 43CB
- Sumit Garden Grove Construction LLP, Mumbai vs Circle 41(3)(1), MumbaiITA 510/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs Johnson Lifts Private Limited, ChennaiITA 3460/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs Johnson Lifts Private Limited, ChennaiITA 3401/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Devipriya Enterprises, Pune vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2), PuneITA 2834/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT, Chennai vs M/S. Bsr Builders Engineers Contractors…ITA 1561/CHNY/2025[2016]Status: Disposed14 Jan 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026