SAR INTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 15(3)(1), MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member: 1. By way of the present appeal the Assessee has challenged the order dated 27/08/2025, passed by the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Prayagraj [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’], whereby the Ld. CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal of the Assessee against the Assessment Order, dated 27/12/2010 passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year 2008-2009. 2. The Assessee has moved an application, dated 08/12/2025, seeking withdrawal of the present appeal on the ground that the Assessee does not wish to pursue the present appeal on account of smallness of the amount of disputed income. Since no Assessment Year: 2008-2009
objection was raised by Learned Departmental Representative, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the aforesaid application moved by the Assessee.
In result, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 18.12.2025. (Arun Khodpia)
Accountant Member
मुंबई Mumbai; िदनांक Dated : 18.12.2025. Milan, LDC
Assessment Year: 2008-2009
आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुƅ/ The CIT 4. Ůधान आयकर आयुƅ / Pr.CIT 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गाडŊ फाईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
सȑािपत Ůित ////
उप/सहायक पंजीकार /(Dy./Asstt.