No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “RAJKOT” BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD
आदेश/O R D E R
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-IV, Rajkot (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 25.03.2014 arising in the penalty order dated 02.03.2012 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2006-07.
ITA No. 331/Rjt/2014 [Falcon Submersible Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT] A.Y. 2006 -07 - 2 -
As per grounds of appeal, the assessee has challenged the imposition of penalty under s.271(1)(c) of the Act on the quantum additions towards profit element on unaccounted sale transactions.
In the course of the haring, the leaned AR for the assessee pointed out that penalty amount of Rs.3,83,920/- only is in dispute as against the penalty of Rs.12,06,600/- mentioned in the grounds of appeal.
The learned AR for the assessee referred to the decision of the co-ordinate bench of ITAT in ITA No. 169/Rjt/2011 order dated 28.11.2018 in respect of quantum additions. The learned AR for the assessee pointed out that the co-ordinate bench has approved the estimations of net profit @ 7% as adopted by the CIT(A) as against 4.89% as declared by the assessee on other recorded sales. The learned AR also submitted that the net profit is merely an estimation and therefore no penalty on such estimation is proper.
On consideration of the submissions of the assessee and the orders of the lower authorities, we find no substance in the plea of the assessee for deletion of penalty. The fact towards existence of unrecorded sales cannot be disputed in view of the findings of the co-ordinate bench in quantum proceedings. Now what is left is estimation of net profit thereon. The Revenue has estimated 7% profit and imposed penalty for concealment of such estimated income whereas the assessee canvasses for adoption of 4.89% as fair estimate. Therefore, the entire issue being the realm of estimation for quantification of concealment, we give benefit of
ITA No. 331/Rjt/2014 [Falcon Submersible Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT] A.Y. 2006 -07 - 3 -
doubt to the assessee and restrict the imposition of penalty to be quantified at the net profit by applying 4.89% of the unrecorded sales despite approval of 7% net profit for the purposes of quantum proceedings.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 08/07/2019
Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 08/07/2019 True Copy S. K. SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।