THE PERFECT WOVEN SACKS PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), RAJKOT-GUJARAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not properly adjudicated the appeal by not considering all the evidence and not providing detailed reasons. The Tribunal noted a lack of basic inquiry by the AO regarding the genuineness of the transaction.
What were the facts?
The assessee company received a cash credit of Rs. 18,50,000/- in its bank account. The guarantor of the loan claimed to have deposited this amount to secure his mortgaged property. However, the guarantor later denied depositing the cash, stating the assessee did it directly.
What were the issues?
Whether the cash deposit in the assessee's account was unexplained investment, and whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated the appeal by considering all evidence and providing reasoned findings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarjit Singh
PER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2007-08, arises from order of the CIT(A)-1, Rajkot dated 30-06-2015, in confirming the addition of Rs.
I.T.A No. 429/Rjt/2015 A.Y. 2007-08 Page No 2
18,50,000/- in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
The fact in brief is that return of income declaring income of Rs. Nil was filed on 31st October, 2007. The case was selected under security by issuing of notice u/s. 143(2) of the act. The assessee company was engaged in the business of manufacturing of HDPE/PP Woven. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assess
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026