M/S LION EXPORTS,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD-5(2), RAJKOT-GUJARAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding foreign tour expenses, finding that the Assessing Officer had not disproved the genuineness of the expenses despite evidence. However, it dismissed the appeal concerning the disallowance of transport expenses for non-deduction of TDS, as the assessee failed to substantiate the nature of the payment as reimbursement.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment based on alleged non-deduction of TDS on transport expenses and unsubstantiated foreign tour expenses. The assessee argued that transport expenses were reimbursements and foreign tour expenses were for business purposes with supporting documents provided.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and whether foreign tour expenses and transport expenses were allowable deductions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 147,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 194C,Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarjit Singh
PER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2005-06, arises from order of the CIT(A)-IV, Rajkot dated 29-10-2014, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- “1. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and facts in confirming the re-opening proceedings the assessment U/s. 148 against the statutory provisions. The reassessment proceedings being bad in law need cancellation.
I.T.A No. 758/Rjt/2014 A.Y. 2005-06 Page No 2 M/s. Lion Exports vs. ITO
The Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and facts in confirming re-opening the assessmen
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026