ITO-42(2)4,MUMBAI, KAUTILYA BHAWAN vs. NISHESH DURGESHKUMAR DUBEY, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable due to the low tax effect, which fell below the monetary limit set by the CBDT Circular. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2015-16. During the hearing, it was noted that the tax effect involved in this appeal was below the prescribed limit of Rs. 60 Lacs as per CBDT Circular No. 09/2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT Circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’
आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M):
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against order dated 28/08/2025 passed by NFAC, Delhi for the quantum of assessment passed u/s.147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the A.Yr. 2015-16.
In the course of hearing, it was noticed that the tax effect on the disputed issue in the impugned assessments years filed by the Revenue was Rs.6,48,000/- for A.Y.2015-16; wherein, the tax effect involved in this appeal was below the Nishesh Durgeshkumar Dubey prescribed limit of Rs.60 Lacs. The Ld. DR, fairly conceded that the present appeal needs to be withdrawn in accordance with the CBDT Circular No.09/2024 dated 17th September, 2024. He, however, requested that a liberty may be given to the Department to verify whether the case was covered in any of the exceptions and, if so, to approach the Tribunal at a later date.
We have considered the request of the Ld. DR. As the tax effect involved in this case is below the limit of Rs.60 Lacs as prescribed in CBDT's Circular No.09/2024 dated 17th September, 2024, the present appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable. The said Circular stipulated that the revised monetary limit for filing of appeals shall apply to pending appeals as well, which may be accordingly withdrawn.
Accordingly, these appeal is liable to be withdrawn by the Revenue and to be treated as dismissed. At the same time, the Revenue is free to approach this Tribunal, in case it is found that the case is covered in any of the exceptions of the said Circular.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 24th December, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026