SHRI RAM MAHARAJA AGARSEN VRADHASHRAM SOCIETY,GHAZIABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)- LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

PDF · subscribers
ITA 190/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 May 2025AY 2024-25Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member)6 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) rejected the applications without giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, to provide an opportunity for a fair hearing on merit, the matters were remitted back to the CIT(E).

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(E) rejecting their applications for registration under Section 12A and 80G. The assessee contended that they had provided all required details and the CIT(E) rejected the applications without affording an opportunity of being heard.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the applications for registration under Sections 12A and 80G without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A,Section 80G,Section 80G(5)(iii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN

For Appellant: Shri Mukul Gupta, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR
Hearing: 13.05.2025

(Assessment Year: 2024-25) Shri Ram Maharaja Agarsen Vradhashram Society, vs. CITE (E), Budh Bazar, Brij Ghat, Lucknow. Garh Mukteshwar, Ghaziabad – 201 001 (Uttar Pradesh). (PAN : AADTS9139H) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Mukul Gupta, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 13.05.2025 Date of Order : 13.05.2025 O R D E R

PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

1.

The assessee has filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow[“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 27.11.2024 & 10.01.2025 for the AY 2024-25.

2.

At the time of hearing, ld. AR for the assessee brought to our notice that the assessee has complied to the notices vide reply dated 24.06.2024, 18.11.2024 and 19.11.2024. He submitted that rejection of application 80G(5)(iii) by the ld. CIT (E) is not maintainable as assessee submitted complete details as asked for in the notices. He submitted that ld. CIT (E) has rejected the application for registration without considering the reply and documents filed at the time of proceedings and prayed that this issue may be remitted back to the ld. CIT(E) with the prayer to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Similarly, the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act was also rejected.

3.

On the other hand, ld. DR for the Revenue objected to the submissions of the ld. counsel for the assessee and relied on the order of Ld. CIT (E).

4.

Considered the rival submissions and material placed on record. We observed that the ld. CIT (E) rejected the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act without giving any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. In our considered view and in the interest of justice, assessee should be given one more opportunity of being heard on merit. Therefore, we direct ld. CIT (E) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (E) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

Similarly, the registration u/s 80G was also rejected on the same ground. The assessee is in appeal before us by filing separate appeal vide ITA No.189/Del/2025. We remit this issue also back to the file of ld. CIT (E) in the interest of justice. Both the issues under consideration may be decided as per law.

6.

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 13TH day of May, 2025 after the conclusion of the hearing.

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →