SHRI RAM MAHARAJA AGARSEN VRADHASHRAM SOCIETY,GHAZIABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)- LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) rejected the applications without giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, to provide an opportunity for a fair hearing on merit, the matters were remitted back to the CIT(E).
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(E) rejecting their applications for registration under Section 12A and 80G. The assessee contended that they had provided all required details and the CIT(E) rejected the applications without affording an opportunity of being heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the applications for registration under Sections 12A and 80G without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN
(Assessment Year: 2024-25) Shri Ram Maharaja Agarsen Vradhashram Society, vs. CITE (E), Budh Bazar, Brij Ghat, Lucknow. Garh Mukteshwar, Ghaziabad – 201 001 (Uttar Pradesh). (PAN : AADTS9139H) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Mukul Gupta, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 13.05.2025 Date of Order : 13.05.2025 O R D E R
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The assessee has filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow[“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 27.11.2024 & 10.01.2025 for the AY 2024-25.
At the time of hearing, ld. AR for the assessee brought to our notice that the assessee has complied to the notices vide reply dated 24.06.2024, 18.11.2024 and 19.11.2024. He submitted that rejection of application 80G(5)(iii) by the ld. CIT (E) is not maintainable as assessee submitted complete details as asked for in the notices. He submitted that ld. CIT (E) has rejected the application for registration without considering the reply and documents filed at the time of proceedings and prayed that this issue may be remitted back to the ld. CIT(E) with the prayer to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Similarly, the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act was also rejected.
On the other hand, ld. DR for the Revenue objected to the submissions of the ld. counsel for the assessee and relied on the order of Ld. CIT (E).
Considered the rival submissions and material placed on record. We observed that the ld. CIT (E) rejected the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act without giving any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. In our considered view and in the interest of justice, assessee should be given one more opportunity of being heard on merit. Therefore, we direct ld. CIT (E) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (E) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Similarly, the registration u/s 80G was also rejected on the same ground. The assessee is in appeal before us by filing separate appeal vide ITA No.189/Del/2025. We remit this issue also back to the file of ld. CIT (E) in the interest of justice. Both the issues under consideration may be decided as per law.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 13TH day of May, 2025 after the conclusion of the hearing.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026