SHRI RAM SEWA NYAS,DELHI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Ld. CIT(E) passed the order without providing a proper opportunity of being heard and without considering the submission and documents produced by the assessee. Therefore, the matter was restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The Appellant trust, which has registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, filed an application for approval under Section 80G (5) (iii) before the Ld. CIT(Exemption). The application was rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) on 27/11/2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application without providing proper opportunity of being heard and considering the submitted documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
(A.Y. 2023-24) Shri Ram Sewa Nyas Vs. CIT(Exemption) 91 Karishma Apartments Delhi Indraprastha Extension, Delhi PAN: ABDTS4121N Appellant Respondent Assessee by CA Anil Garg Revenue by Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing 06/05/2025 Date of Pronouncement 09/05/2025 ORDER
PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM:
The present appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)-Delhi, (‘Ld. CIT(E) ’ for short) dated 27/11/2024.
Brief facts of the case are that, the Appellant trust having registration u/s 12A of the Act which is having main object of relief to the poor, education, medical relief, yoga, preservation of environment and advancement of any other objects of general public utility. The Appellant filed application in Form No. 10AD for approval under Section 80G (5) (iii) of the Income Tax, 1961 (‘Act’ for short) before the Ld. CIT(Exemption), Delhi. The application filed by the Appellant came to be rejected by the CIT(Exemption) vide order dated 27/11/2024, which has been called in question in the present Appeal.
The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submitted that, the Ld. CIT(E) has passed the order impugned without providing proper opportunity of being heard and without considering the submission made and the documents produced by the Assessee on 27/11/2024. Thus, sought for allowing the appeal.
Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that even after providing ample opportunities, the applicant has not submitted the documents on time and absence of the documents and the submissions the Ld. CIT(E) rightly rejected application filed by the Appellant. Thus, sought for dismissal of the Appeal.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is found that the Assessee has filed submission and the document on 27/11/2024, however, without considering the same, the order impugned came to be passed. It was the case of the Appellant that the documents could not be filed before 27/11/2024, the Assessee had to get the bank statement from the bank located at Lucknow which consumed time. In view of the above facts and circumstances, considering the nature of the activities carried out by the appellant and in the interest of justice, we restore the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction to decide the application afresh after considering all the documents produced by the Appellant and pass the order in accordance with law after providing opportunity of being heard to the Appellant. The Appellant is also at liberty to produce further documents if any before the Ld. CIT(E) to substantiate it’s the claim.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Appellant is partly allowed for statistical purpose.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026