PALIWAL EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 19(1), NEW DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, remitted the matter back to the AO for fresh adjudication, observing the assessee's non-compliance before lower authorities. The AO is directed to decide the issue de novo, providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard, and the assessee must participate in the proceedings.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) for non-prosecution, as the assessee failed to respond to notices and appear before the Assessing Officer (AO). The assessee's representative requested that the matter be remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication, assuring future participation.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal dismissed by the CIT(A) for non-prosecution should be remitted to the AO for a fresh hearing, granting the assessee another opportunity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “C” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
ORDER
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM :
The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee seeking to assail the First Appellate order dated 18.12.2024 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi [“Ld.CIT(A)”] in Appeal No.cit(a), Delhi-7/10095/2018-19 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising from the assessment order dated 05.12.2017 passed u/s 147/144 of the Act pertaining to assessment year 2010-11.
At the outset, it is seen that the appeal of the assessee is dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) for non-prosecution. Before us, the Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has issued notices which were not responded by the assessee. He further submitted that the assessee has failed to appear even before the AO. He thus prayed that the matter may be sent back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication and assured for regular participation in the proceedings.
Per contra, the Ld. Sr. DR has not objected to the request of the assessee. 4. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. After considering the arguments, we find that in the instant case, Page | 1 due compliance could not be made before the lower authorities on behalf of the assessee. Under these circumstances, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity is given to the assessee and the matter is remitted back to the file of the AO with direction to decide the issue denovo afresh after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to participate in proceedings before the AO. With these directions, the case is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026