AMLESHWAR DE vs. THAN SEVA CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed the order in the absence of the assessee. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the issue to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) rejected the application without providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard, as the assessee failed to appear before the authority.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in rejecting the registration application without affording a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM & SHRI O. P. MEENA, AM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM AND SHRI O. P. MEENA, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 2991/Ahd/2014 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: ) बिधम/ The Trustee Amleshwar CIT-III, 2nd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Devsthan Seva Charitable Vs. Trust, at & PO, Amleshwar, Annexe, Race Course Cirlce Bharuch-392001. Baroda-7. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAETA1691B (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri Mayank Pandey (Sr. DR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 01/10/2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 01/10/2019 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, JM: The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order dated 31.07.2014 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III, Baroda [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”] in which the application for registration u/s 12A of the I. T. Act, 1961 has been order to be rejected. The assessee has raised the following grounds: - 2.
“Ld. CIT(III) erred in law and on facts in refusing to grant registration u/s 12AA of the Act to the appellant Trust. Ld.CIT(III) ought to have granted registration in light of the fact that all the requisite formalities under the provisions ofthe Act were complied with by the appellant Trust. 2. Ld. CIT(III) erred in law and on facts in holding that the Trust was not genuinely carrying activities in terms of objects in
ITA. No.2991/Ahd/2014 A.Y
Trust deed without verifying and appreciating the facts of the matter. The order of ld. CIT(III) being unjust, perverse and against the Principles of Natural Justice denying registration to appellant Trust created to carry out genuine charitable activities deserves to be quashed and Trust be granted registration u/s 12AA of the Act. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, edit, delete, modify or change all or any of the grounds of appeal at the time of or before the hearing of the appeal.”
The brief facts of the case are that the Amleshwar Devsthan Seva Charitable Trust, registered on 05.03.2013 moved an application for registration u/s 12A of the Income tax Act, 1961 which was received in the office of Commissioner of Income Tax-III Baroda on 28.01.2014. The necessary details were called, the assessee failed to appear before the authority below, therefore, the application u/s 12A of the Act was rejected. 4. We have heard the argument advanced by the Ld. Representative of the Department and has gone through the case carefully. We find that the Commissioner of Income-tax-III Baroda has passed the order in the absence of the assessee/representative of the assessee. In the interest of justice a fair and reasonable opportunity is required to be given to the assessee before passing the order. Therefore, we set aside the finding of the CIT-III Baroda and restore the issue before him to decide the matter of controversy afresh by giving an opportunity of being heard to the assessee in accordance with law. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed for statistical purposes.
ITA. No.2991/Ahd/2014 A.Y
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby ordered to be allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 01/10/2019. Sd/- Sd/- (AMARJIT SINGH) (O. P. MEENA) लेखध सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यधनिक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER Surat, दिनांक Dated : 01/10/2019 Vijay Pal Singh/Sr. PS Copy sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / / TRUE COPY / / Assistant Registrar, Surat
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Atiquiddin Shaikh vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Mr. Gurudev Singh vs. Kotak Mahindra BankMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026