M/S. JAYSHREE FINVEST LTD.,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5, RAJKOT-GUJARAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 14A of the Income Tax Act applies irrespective of whether shares are held as stock-in-trade or as capital assets. Therefore, the assessee's plea was found to have no merit.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a dealer in shares, appealed against the disallowance of Rs. 9,69,399/- made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The assessee argued that dividend income from trading assets is not subject to disallowance under Section 14A.
What were the issues?
Whether dividend income earned from shares held as stock-in-trade is eligible for disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing402 ITR 640 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “RAJKOT” BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
आदेश/O R D E R
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Rajkot (‘CIT' in short), dated 16.11.2017
ITA No. 36/Rjt/18 [M/s. Jayshree Finvest Ltd. vs. CIT(A)] A.Y. 2010-11 - 2 -
arising in the assessment order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2010-11.
The solitary ground of appeal raised by the assessee concerns disallowance of Rs.9,69,399/- made under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules.
When the matter was called for hearing, none appeared for the assessee. However, a written submission was placed on record. The matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte on the basis of written submissions filed.
The learned DR for the Revenue relied upon the order of the CIT(A).
We have carefully considered the rival submissions. As per the submissions, the assessee seeks to submit that the assessee being a dealer in shares and securities and holds shares as trading assets, the dividend income generated from such trading asset in not susceptible to the disallowance under s.14A of the Act. We find that the issue is no longer res integra. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs. CIT [2018] 402 ITR 640 (SC) has inter alia hold that Section 14A of the Act applies irrespective of whether the shares are held as stock-in-trade or as capital asset. Thus, in view of the decision
ITA No. 36/Rjt/18 [M/s. Jayshree Finvest Ltd. vs. CIT(A)] A.Y. 2010-11 - 3 -
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, we see no merit in the plea of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 15/11/2019
Sd/- Sd/- (MADHUMITA ROY) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 15/11/2019 True Copy S. K. SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
Deputy/Asstt. Registrar ITAT, Rajkot
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “RAJKOT” BENCH, RAJKOT [Conducted through E-Court at Ahmedabad]
BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SMT. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 36/Rjt/2018 (�नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2010-11)
M/s. Jayshree Finvest The Commissioner of बनाम/ Ltd. Income Tax Appeal-3 Vs. Ground Floor, Ajay Rajkot Mension, Malaviya Road, Rajkot �थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAAS2360J .. (अपीलाथ� /Appellant) (��यथ� / Respondent)
अपीलाथ� ओर से /Appellant by : None (Written Submission) ��यथ� क� ओर से / Mr. Suhas Mistry, Sr.D.R. Respondent by : सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of 14/10/2019 Hearing घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of 15/11/2019 Pronouncement
आदेश/O R D E R
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Rajkot (‘CIT' in short), dated 16.11.2017
ITA No. 36/Rjt/18 [M/s. Jayshree Finvest Ltd. vs. CIT(A)] A.Y. 2010-11 - 2 -
arising in the assessment order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2010-11.
The solitary ground of appeal raised by the assessee concerns disallowance of Rs.9,69,399/- made under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules.
When the matter was called for hearing, none appeared for the assessee. However, a written submission was placed on record. The matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte on the basis of written submissions filed.
The learned DR for the Revenue relied upon the order of the CIT(A).
We have carefully considered the rival submissions. As per the submissions, the assessee seeks to submit that the assessee being a dealer in shares and securities and holds shares as trading assets, the dividend income generated from such trading asset in not susceptible to the disallowance under s.14A of the Act. We find that the issue is no longer res integra. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs. CIT [2018] 402 ITR 640 (SC) has inter alia hold that Section 14A of the Act applies irrespective of whether the shares are held as stock-in-trade or as capital asset. Thus, in view of the decision
ITA No. 36/Rjt/18 [M/s. Jayshree Finvest Ltd. vs. CIT(A)] A.Y. 2010-11 - 3 -
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, we see no merit in the plea of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 15/11/2019
Sd/- Sd/- (MADHUMITA ROY) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 15/11/2019 True Copy S. K. SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
Deputy/Asstt. Registrar ITAT, Rajkot
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026