PARAMESWAR MULTI PURPOSE COAL TRANSPORT CO-OP LIMITED,ANGUL vs. ITO,ANGUL WARD, ANGUL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1/CTK/2019Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 May 2019AY 2015-164 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities. The issue was remitted back to the Assessing Officer to accept the correct cash book, verify it, and decide the issue afresh after providing an opportunity to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer made an addition based on a cash book, which the assessee claimed was incorrect due to a technical error. The assessee contended that a correct cash book was subsequently provided to both the AO and the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether the addition made by the Assessing Officer based on an incorrect cash book was justified, and if the assessee should be allowed to submit a corrected cash book.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK

Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG

For Appellant: Shri K.K.Bal
For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Hearing: 14/05Pronounced: 14/05

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK

BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ITA No.01/CTK/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16

Parameswar Multi Purpose Vs. ITO, Angul Ward, Angul Coal Transport Co-operative Limited, At: Ambamunda, Talcher, Dist: Angul. PAN/GIR No.AABAP 9791 P (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

ITA No.02/CTK/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16

M/s. Laxminarayana Self Vs. ITO, Angul Ward, Angul Labour & Transport, At: Shree Ganesh Villa, Qr No.9, Bikash Nagar, PTI, Angul PAN/GIR No.AAAAL 5590 P (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri K.K.Bal Revenue by : Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR

Date of Hearing : 14/05/ 2019 Date of Pronouncement : 14/05/ 2019

O R D E R Both the appeals filed by the separate assesses are directed

against the common order of the Commissioner of Income

P a g e 1 | 4

ITA No. 01& 02/CT K/ 2019 Asse ssment Year: 20 15- 16

Tax(Appeals)-2, Bhubaneswar both dated 10.10.2018 for the

assessment year 2015-16.

2.

The common grounds raised in both the appeals are as

under:

“1. For that the order of the forum below is arbitrary and unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence liable to be quashed. 2. For that the AO erred in making addition by taking into account the wrong cash book instead of the actual cash book furnished by the Accountant of the assessee in the course of assessment. Therefore, the addition is arbitrary and liable to be deleted. 3. For that the AO erred in making addition u/s.68 the negative cash balance, which has not been credited in the assessee’s books of account. Therefore, the addition is illegal and liable to be deleted. 4. For that in course of assessment the assessee furnished the salary distribution statement in support of the salary paid to the employees. In the salary distribution statement, the employees have put their signature with date while receiving the salary. This fact should have been considered prior to making addition. Therefore, the addition is not just and proper and liable to be deleted. 5. For that the CIT(A) erred in appreciating the peak negative cash balance without verifying the actual cashbook and supporting evidence.” 3. I have considered the rival submissions, perused the

relevant materials on record of the Tribunal. Ld A.R. of the

assessee submitted that the Assessing Officer has taken into

consideration the wrong cash book while making the addition

ignoring the correct cash book filed before him. He submitted that

P a g e 2 | 4

ITA No. 01& 02/CT K/ 2019 Asse ssment Year: 20 15- 16

before the CIT(A), the assessee had taken a plea that the due to

technical error while taking print out from tally package, the

negative cash book was furnished, however, when it came to the

knowledge of the assessee, the correct cash book was furnished,

but the Assessing Officer refused to take the same on record. The

CIT(A) did not accept the contention of the assessee and

confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. Ld A.R. also

submitted that although the correct cash book was filed before the

CIT(A), he did not give any findings on the same. Therefore, the

matter be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to consider

the correct cash book and decide the issue afresh.

4.

Ld D.R. agreed to the submissions of the assessee and also

further submitted that to avoid the multiplicity of the proceedings,

the matter should be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer.

5.

In view of above, I set aside the orders of lower authorities

and remit this issue in both the appeals to the file of the Assessing

Officer for limited purposes that to accept the correct cash book

on record and after verification decide the issue afresh as per law

and after giving opportunity to the assessee.

P a g e 3 | 4

ITA No. 01& 02/CT K/ 2019 Asse ssment Year: 20 15- 16

6.

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical

purposes.

Order pronounced on 14 /05/2019. Sd/- (Chandra Mohan Garg) JUDICIALMEMBER Cuttack; Dated 14 /05/2019 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Parameswar Multi Purpose Coal Transport Co-operative Limited, At: Ambamunda, Talcher, Dist: Angul/

Laxminarayan Self Labour Transport Limited.,Angul.

2.

The Respondent. ITO, Angul Ward, Angul 3. The CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar 4. Pr.CIT-2, Bhubaneswar. 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy// By order

Sr. Pvt. Secretary, ITAT, Cuttack

P a g e 4 | 4

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →