DIRECTOR,DIRECTORATE OF RADIATION SAFETY,TRICHUR vs. THE ITOTDS, TRICHUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fee under Section 234E is mandatory if TDS statements are not filed on time, as per the provisions effective from 01.07.2012. Therefore, the Tribunal had no power to examine the matter further.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) imposing a late fee under Section 234E. This fee was for the default in furnishing TDS statements in Form No.24Q for the fourth quarter of the financial year 2015-2016.
What were the issues?
Whether the late fee under Section 234E is mandatory for delayed filing of TDS statements. Whether the Tribunal has the power to waive or examine the mandatory late fee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM
Per Chandra Poojari, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A), dated 03.08.2018, imposing late fee u/s 234E of the I.T.Act for default in furnishing statements of TDS in Form No.24Q for fourth quarter of the financial year 2015- 2016.
After hearing both the parties, we are of the opinion that, with effect from 01.07.2012 as per section 234E of the Act, if any TDS statement is not filed in time, the levy of late fee under this section is mandatory and being so, we have no power to examine the same. Accordingly, we confirm the order of the CIT(A), as the issue is relating to A.Y. 2015-2016.
ITA No.511/Coch/2018 2 The Director, Directorate of Radiation Safety. 3. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on this 07th day of February, 2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (George George K) (Chandra Poojari) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Cochin ; Dated : 07th February, 2019. Devdas*
Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT (A), Trichur. 4. The CIT, TDS, Kochi. 5. DR, ITAT, Cochin 6. Guard file.
BY ORDER,
(Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Cochin
More judgments on Section 234E
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026