BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT, (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-5., AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issues raised in the revision proceedings had already been decided in favour of the assessee in a previous order. Therefore, the assessment order could not be considered erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged a revision order passed by the CIT under section 263, which directed the AO to reconsider accumulated income and corpus donations. The CIT found the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 and directing reconsideration of accumulated income and corpus donations when similar issues were decided in favour of the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD BENCH “D” , AHMEDABAD
Per Pramod Kumar VP:
By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged correctness of the order dated 16th February 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, in exercise of his powers under section 263 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. Grievance of the assessee, in substance, is that, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, learned Commissioner erred in law and on facts in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 and in directing the Assessing Officer to consider the accumulated income of Rs 1,00,00,000 and Rs 60,00,000 for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 respectively and the amount of Rs 14,97,06,406 received as corpus donation which was stated to be in nature of voluntary donations. 3. To adjudicate on this appeal, it is sufficient to take note of the fact that vide our order dated 24th January, 2019, in assessee’s own case, these issues, which are foundational to the revision proceedings, have been decided in favour of the assessee. There is, as such, no question of the related assessment order under section 143(3), which is subjected to revision proceedings, being held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Learned representatives had fairly agreed
ITA No. 1043/Ahd/2016 Baroda Cricket Association Vs. DCIT Assessment year: 2009-10 Page 2 of 2 that the issues were to be decided in favour of the assessee on merits, the present revision order will have to be quashed. 4. In view of the above discussions, and bearing in mind entirety of the case, we vacate the impugned revision order. The assessee gets the relief accordingly. 5. In the result, the appeal is allowed. Pronounced in the open court today on the 4th day of March, 2019. Sd/- Sd/-
Justice P P Bhatt Pramod Kumar (President) (Vice President) Ahmedabad, dated 4th day of March, 2019
Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) DR (6) Guard File By order etc True Copy Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad benches, Ahmedabad
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026