YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION,KENDRAPADA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) did not sufficiently verify the genuineness of the assessee's objects and activities. Therefore, the assessee was granted one more opportunity to substantiate its claim before the CIT(E).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application citing non-compliance with the required conditions.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) properly verified the genuineness of the society's objects and activities before rejecting the registration application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM & SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM
आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK श्री चन्द्र मोहन गगग, न्द्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री एऱ.ऩी.साहु, ऱेखा सदस्य के समऺ । BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM आयकर अऩीऱ सं./ITA No.361/CTK/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : NA) Young Men’s Christian Vs. CIT(E), Hyderabad Association, Tankibelary, POL Nantar, Via-Mahalkalpada, Dist: kendrapara-754224 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ PAN No. : AAAAY 0927 D (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..
यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Kanhayalal Sharma, AR राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 21/08/2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 04/09/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(E), Hyderabad, dated 29.06.2015. 2. The sole issue involved in the present appeal of the assessee is with respect to rejection of application for grant of registration u/s.12AA of the Act. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a society and filed an application in Form No.10A dated 26.12.2014 seeking registration u/s.12AA of the Act, however, the CIT(E) rejected the application for grant
2 ITA No.361/CTK/2015 of registration on the ground that there was no required complete compliance on the part of the assessee-society. 4. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(E), the assessee has filed an appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Ld. AR before us submitted that the CIT(E) has not provided any reasonable opportunity to the assessee of being heard as provided in the proviso to Section 12AA(1) of the Act, 1961. Even the assessee has filed its written submission in compliance to the notice dated 25.03.2015 issued by the CIT(E), however, without considering the same, the CIT(E) rejected the application for grant of registration u/s.12AA of the Act. Therefore, ld. AR submitted that the CIT(E) may kindly be directed to grant registration u/s.12AA of the Act after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and considering the submissions of the assessee. 6. On the other hand, ld. DR before us submitted that the CIT(E) has rejected the registration application u/s.12AA of the Act as the assessee has not complied with the conditions required for registration and, therefore, assessee’s appeal should be dismissed. 7. We have heard submissions of both the parties and carefully perused the material on record. The sole dispute is with respect to rejection of registration u/s.12AA of the Act. On perusal of the order of CIT(E), we find that the CIT(E) asked the assessee to furnish a note on the activities undertaken by their institution and to explain as to how the same are as per their objects and further the assessee could not make
3 ITA No.361/CTK/2015 compliance as required by the CIT(E) and, therefore, the CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee. In our opinion the CIT(E) at the time of registration has to verify whether the objects and the activities of the assessee society are genuine. Therefore, these fact does not emanate from the CIT(E) order where the CIT(E) has verified the objects and there is no finding in this regard. Accordingly, in the interest of substantial justice, we provide one more opportunity to the assessee to substantiates its claim with supporting evidence of genuineness of objects and activities of the assessee society before the CIT(E) and the CIT(E) is directed to consider the submission of the assessee and pass the order accordingly. Thus, the ground of appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 8. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 04/09/2019. Sd/- Sd/- (C.M.GARG) (L.P.SAHU) न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER कटक Cuttack; ददनांक Dated 04/09/2019 प्र.कु.मम/PKM, Sr.P.S. आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant- . Young Men’s Christian Association, Tankibelary, POL Nantar, Via-Mahalkalpada, Dist: kendrapara-754224 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- DCIT, Circle-1(1), Bhubaneswar आयकर आयुक्त(अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A), 3. 4. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 5. ववभागीय प्रयतयनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, कटक / DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. गार्ग पाईऱ / Guard file. सत्यावऩत प्रयत //True Copy// आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER,
(Senior Private Secretary) आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक / ITAT, Cuttack
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026