Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘D’
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद �यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘D’
BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 871/Ahd/2017 �नधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2009-10 Smt.Ritaben Yogeshbhai Shah ITO, Ward-7(3) Prop: Rushabh Chemicals Vs Ahmedabad. C-402, Sukun 4, Parishram Tower Ankur Road, Narangpura Ahmedabad. PAN : AEXPG 9121 K अपीलाथ�/ (Appellant) �� यथ�/ (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Aoitya Shukla, Sr.DR सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 07/03/2019 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 11/03/2019 O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-10, Ahmedabad dated 29.11.2016 passed for the Asstt.Year 2009-10 challenging levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. Notice of hearing was sent to the assessee by regd. AD post. The same was served as the AD slip has been returned by the postal authority and placed on record. Assessee has not filed any adjournment application nor intimated about reasons for her non-appearance on the date of hearing. In view of this, it is presumed that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal before the Tribunal, therefore, appeal of the assessee stand dismissed for
ITA No.871 /Ahd/2017 - 2 -
want of prosecution following decision of the ITAT, Delhi Bench in CIT Vs. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Delhi).
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Pronounced in the Open Court on 11th March, 2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (RAJPAL YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER