MAA JAGAT JANANI EDUCATION,NABARANGPUR vs. C.I.T.(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not provided with a proper opportunity of being heard and thus could not furnish necessary evidence. The CIT(Exemptions) was directed to verify the documents after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application citing violation of Rule 17A and inability to verify the genuineness of activities due to lack of bills/vouchers and accounts.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) rightly rejected the application for registration without providing a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee and verifying submitted documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM
आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA No.180/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2019-2020) Maa Jagat Janani Educational & Vs. CIT(Exemptions), Charitable Trust, Hyderabad Valisalguda, Dist-Nabarangpur-764059 स्थायी लेखा सं./PANNo. : AAETM 5338 B (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
सुनवाई की तािीख / Date of Hearing : 15/11/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date of Pronouncement : 19/11/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, AM: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad, dated 26.04.2019 passed u/s. 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Act, 1961. 2. The sole issue involved in this appeal is with regard to rejection of application filed by the assessee for registration u/s. 12AA of the Act. 3. The assessee filed an application in Form 10A seeking registration u/s.12A of the Act on 29.10.2018, which was rejected by the CIT(E) holding that the assessee has violated Rule 17A of I.T.Rules, 1962 as the genuineness of the activities of the trust could not be
2 ITA No.180/CTK/2019 verified in absence of bills/vouchers and books of accounts and,
therefore, the assessee is not eligible for the same.
Ld. AR before us submitted that no notice was served on the
assessee trust, however, an e-mail was received on 18.04.2019
regarding fixing of the case and by that time the Chartered Accountant
of the assessee-trust was out of station, therefore, he could not produce
the necessary connected evidences for want of proper opportunity of
being heard. It was also the contention of ld. AR that had the effective
opportunity of hearing been given to the assessee, it could have
produced evidences in support of its claim and would have explained
its claim that the assessee is a charitable organization and certainly
entitled for registration u/s.12A of the Act. Therefore, ld. AR submitted
that CIT(E) may kindly be directed to grant the application of the
assessee for registration u/s.12A of the Act after providing sufficient
opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
On the other hand, ld. DR supported the order of CIT(Exemption).
We have heard rival submissions and perused the materials
available on record. The sole disputed issue is with respect to the
rejection of application for grant of registration u/s.12A of the Act. On
perusal of the impugned order, we find that the CIT(E) has rejected the
application of the assessee on account of non-compliance. Now, before
us, ld. AR submitted that the assessee was having all the required
3 ITA No.180/CTK/2019 documents/evidences, however, in absence of grant of any opportunity of hearing by the CIT(E), the assessee could not furnish the evidences in support of its claim that the assessee is a charitable organization and entitled for registration u/s.12A of the Act. During the course of hearing, ld. AR also drew our attention to the object clause of the trust in the trust deed contained at Annexure-5, pages 1 to 9 of the paper book. Ld. AR also drew our attention to the Annexure-6, page 5 of the paper book which contains income and expenditure account for the year ending 31.03.2018. The above documents were not produced by the assessee before the CIT(E) resulting into rejection of the application for grant of registration. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we direct the CIT(E) to verify the documents/evidences to be furnished by the assessee to substantiate its claim after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the CIT(E) in early disposal of the case. Thus, the sole ground raised by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 7. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 19/11/2019. Sd/- Sd/- (C.M.GARG) (L.P.SAHU) न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER कटक Cuttack; ददनांक Dated 19/11/2019 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S.
4 ITA No.180/CTK/2019 आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीलाथी / The Appellant- 1. Maa Jagat Janani Educational & Charitable Trust, Valisalguda, Dist-Nabarangpur-764059 प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- 2. CIT(Exemptions), Hyderabad आयकि आयुक्त(अऩील) / The CIT(A), 3. आयकि आयुक्त / CIT 4. ववभागीय प्रनतननधध, आयकि अऩीलीय अधधकिण, कटक / DR, ITAT, 5. Cuttack गार्ा पाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER, सत्यावऩत प्रनत //True Copy// (Senior Private Secretary) ITAT Cuttack Bench, Cuttack
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026