SHRADDHA KAPOOR,MUMBAI vs. PR.CIT- 18, NEW DELHI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: G: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUNIL KUAMAR SINGH & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGHAssessment Year: 2015-16
PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JM:
This appeal has been preferred against the impugned order dated
12.03.2019 passed by the Ld. PCIT-18, New Delhi.
2. At the very outset, it has been informed on behalf of the assessee that the assessee has settled the matter under DTVSV 2020. In pursuance thereof, the assessee has withdrawn the appeal filed before CIT(A) against the order
2
dated 29.12.2019 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act. Thus, according to the appellant assessee, this appeal has become infructuous. The appellant has enclosed said order dated 26.03.2021 passed by ld. CIT(A), wherein, it is specifically mentioned that the appellant opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme vide application dated 28.12.2020 pursuant thereto, the PCIT-12, Delhi has certified the full and final payment as taxes in terms of Form No. 5 dated
25.03.2021. In view of this, assessee’s appeal is liable to be dismissed as infructuous.
4. In view of appellant’s request, the assessee’s appeal stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order pronounced in the open court on 15.05.2025. (BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 15th May, 2025. NV