DY . CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI RAJESH R SARDA, NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 127/NAG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 March 2019AY 2011-20124 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the tax effect was indeed below Rs. 20 lakhs. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable in view of the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department as per the CBDT Circular.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee's counsel pointed out that the tax effect was below Rs. 20 lakhs, making the appeal not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 03/2018.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT due to the tax effect being below the prescribed monetary limit set by the CBDT.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM

Hearing: 25.03.2019Pronounced: 25.03.2019

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ukxiqj �यायपीठ, ukxiqj म� । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR �ी डी. क�णाकरा राव, लेखा सद�य एवं �ी िवकास अव�थी, �याियक सद�य के सम� BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.127/NAG/2018 िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2011–12 DCIT, Central Circle–2(2), .......अपीलाथ� / Appellant Nagpur. बनाम / V/s. Shri Rajesh R. Sarda, 14, Daga Lay–out, Ambazari Road, Nagpur–440033. ……��यथ� / Respondent PAN : AHAPS4925M Revenue by : Shri U. U. Kasar, DR Assessee by : Shri Vijay Agarwal, CA सुनवाई क� तारीख / Date of Hearing : 25.03.2019 घोषणा क� तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 25.03.2019 आदेश / ORDER PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM: This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of CIT(A)-3, Nagpur dated 26.03.2018 for the Assessment Year 2011-12.

2 ITA No.127/NAG/2018 2. Before us, ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue is below Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the latest CBDT Circular No.03/2018 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] dated 11th July, 2018 which is applicable even to pending appeals, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable. 3. The ld. DR fairly admitted that the tax effect involved in the impugned appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue has to be dismissed. 4. After hearing both the sides, we find the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue in the impugned appeal is admittedly below Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable in view of the CBDT Circular No.3/2018, dated 11.07.2018 which has revised the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal with retrospective effect. As per the said Circular (supra), the monetary limit of tax effect for filing of appeals before the Tribunal by the Department has been raised to Rs.20 lakhs. We find the tax effect in the present appeal is

3 ITA No.127/NAG/2018 below Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, without going into the merits of the issues/grounds, the present appeal is dismissed as the said appeal is in contravention of the CBDT Circular dated 11-07-2018 (supra). 5. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 25th day of March, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (िवकास अव�थी /VIKAS AWASTHY) (डी. क�णाकरा राव/D. KARUNAKARA RAO) �याियक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ukxiqj / Nagpur; �दनांक / Dated : 25th March, 2019. Sujeet आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(A) 4. The CIT िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ukxiqj ब�च, 5. ukxiqj / DR, ITAT, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary

4 ITA No.127/NAG/2018 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ukxiqj / ITAT, Nagpur.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →