MATA SITA VEDIC KANYA GURUKUL,DELHI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) DELHI, DELHI

At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has rejected the application for grant of registration u/s 12A(1)ac(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short]. It is the say of the ld. counsel for the assessee that the founder trustee was suffering from cancer and hence she could not tend to the trust matters. The ld. counsel for the assessee prayed for condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

Per contra, the ld. DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below.

The reasons stated by the ld. counsel for the assessee for delay in filing the appeal seem to be reasonable. Accordingly, we condone the delay.

We have heard the rival submissions and have perused the relevant material on record. We find that the ld. CIT(E) has decided the issue without appreciation of facts. We are of the considered view that the assessee has reasonable cause for not participating before the ld. CIT(E). [A.Y 2025-26]

In view of the above facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice and fair play, we are of the considered view that the matter be restored back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to decide the issues afresh after allowing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

The ld. CIT(E) is directed to decide the issues afresh after affording reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to provide necessary information /documents as required by the authorities.

In the result, appeal of assessee in ITA No. 1560/DEL/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open court on 16.05.2025. [MAHAVIR SINGH]