DCIT, DELHI vs. RAJ KUMARS SHREE NATH DIAMONDS PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had successfully settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, by fulfilling all stipulated conditions and making the required payment.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) concerning AY 2017-18. The assessee had opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, fulfilled all conditions, and paid the determined amount.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn, given the assessee's settlement of the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “F”, NEW DELHI
Before: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to as “NFAC”), Delhi dated 28.03.2024 passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and relates to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18.
At the outset itself, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted in writing before us that the assessee had availed for settlement of the dispute under the Direct TaxVivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and had duly filed DTVSV Form No.1 on 31.01.2025 which application of the assessee was approved by Pr.CIT, Delhi on 02.04.2025 determining a sum of Rs.87,66,580/- as required to be paid for full and final settlement for the resolution of the impugned dispute, furnishing Form No.2 dated 02.04.2025 in this regard. He pointed out that the assessee had paid the said amount on 05.04.2025. Copy of challan dated 05.04.2025 was furnished before us. Ld. Counsel for the assessee, therefore, stated that since all conditions stipulated for the settlement of the dispute under the Direct Tax VSV Scheme, 2024 stood fulfilled by the assessee, he pleaded for the withdrawal of the instant appeal before us.
Ld. DR fairly agreed with the above.
In view of the factual submissions made by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee before us duly supported with evidences demonstrating the settlement of the assessee’s dispute under the VSV Scheme, 2024 by way of Form 1 and Form 2 alongwith the copy of the challan showing payment of the tax determined as payable by the assessee under the said Scheme, being furnished before us,the impugned appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order pronounced on 16/05/2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026