OMEGA BROADCAST PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. ACIT, CIR-2(1)(1), GHAZIABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted to settle the issues under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and had filed for withdrawal of the appeal. The Ld. Sr. DR had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Ld. CIT(A), which arose from an order by the Assessing Officer. The assessee submitted a Form 5 for full and final settlement of tax arrears under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
Date of Hearing 21/05/2025 Date of Pronouncement 21/05/2025 ORDER
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The appeal filed by the assessee is against order dated 03.07.2024 of Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals)/National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred as “Ld. CIT(A)”) passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter, the ‘Act’) arising out of order dated 11.12.2018 by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -2(1)(1), Ghaziabad (hereinafter referred as “the Ld. Assessing Officer) under Section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act for assessment year 2015-16.
At the time of hearing, Learned Authorised Representative for the for appellant/assessee submitted that Form 5 dated 06.05.2025 regarding full and final settlement of tax arrears determined in order No.982701940010121 dated 01.01.2021 and prayed that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. Sr. DR raised no objection to withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
Heard. In light of submission on behalf of the assessee, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as the assessee has opted to settle the issues under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026