← Back to search

GURCHARAN SINGH,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(1), DELHI, DELHI

PDF
ITA 4248/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 May 20253 pages

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWALAssessment Year: 2019-20 Sh. Gurcharan Singh, 12/161, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(1), Delhi PAN: AAKPS0492G (Appellant)

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT(A)-
5, Chennai’s DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-
25/1068136164(1), dated 29.08.2024, involving proceedings under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
2. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Assessee by Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv.
Sh. Somil Aggarwal, Adv.
Department by Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
26.05.2025
Date of pronouncement
26.05.2025
2 | P a g e

3.

Suffice to say, it transpires during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have denied the assessee’s foreign tax credit claim of Rs. 2,83,170/- under section 90 r.w.s. 90A of the Act for the sole reason that he had not filed/uploaded his corresponding Form 67 on or before the prescribed “due” date in the course of section 143(1) processing, dated 18th March, 2021 and upheld in the lower appellate discussion.

This is what leaves the assessee aggrieved.
4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee’s and department’s vehement arguments reiterating their respective stands. It further emerges that the assessee had subsequently complied with the above Form 67 filing/uploading post facto the due date thereof as admitted by both the parties. And also, that this tribunal’s order dated 4th April, 2024 in the assessee’s case ITA
No. 380/Del/2024 for succeeding assessment years 2020-21 has already accepted his case in principle against the department on the very issue, thereby holding that the above compliance of filing of Form 67 is directory than mandatory in nature. We thus adopt judicial consistency herein as well to allow the assessee’s impugned claim of foreign tax credit in very terms and direct the assessing
3 | P a g e authority to frame its consequential computation as per law after verification of all the relevant facts.
5. This assessee’s appeal is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26th May, 2025 (MANISH AGARWAL)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 26th May, 2025. RK/-

GURCHARAN SINGH,DELHI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(1), DELHI, DELHI | BharatTax