DENIS CHEM LAB LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY. CIT, MEHSANA CIRCLE, MEHSANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to remit the matter back to the Assessing Officer. The AO was directed to allow relief for any PF/ESI contributions made during the grace period allowed by the respective statutes.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the disallowance of belatedly paid Provident Fund (PF) and Employees State Insurance (ESI) contributions. The assessee's counsel conceded that the jurisdictional High Court had ruled against them on this issue.
What were the issues?
Whether belatedly paid PF and ESI contributions, made before the due date of filing the income tax return, are allowable as a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Per Pramod Kumar, Vice President:
This appeal challenges correctness of learned CIT(A)’s order dated 31st July 1. 2017 in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2014-15.
Grievance of the assessee, in substance, is against learned CIT(A)’s confirming the disallowance of Rs.15,91,602/- and Rs.82,312/- being the amounts of contribution to Provident Fund and Employees State Insurance contribution which were belatedly paid before the due date for filing of income tax return under section 139(1).
When the appeal was called out for hearing, learned counsel for the assessee fairly submits that, in view of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court’s decision against the assessee on the issue, he wishes to restrict his grievance against disallowance of PF and ESI contribution paid within the permissible grace period under the respective statute. Learned Departmental Representative, on the other hand, contends that any relief on this issue should be subject to necessary verification by the Assessing Officer.
Denis Chem Lab Ltd Vs. DCIT Assessment year: 2014-15 Page 2 of 2
In view of the above discussions and bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to remit the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for the limited purpose of allowing relief in respect of any PF/ESI contribution made during the grace period. Ordered, accordingly.
More judgments on Section 139(1)
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 485/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026