BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,(BCA),VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the revisional order under section 263, which formed the basis for the assessment order, was quashed by a Co-ordinate Bench. Consequently, the assessment order ceased to survive.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the denial of exemptions under sections 11 & 12. The assessment order was passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the assessment order which was based on a quashed revisional order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD
The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-9, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 28.11.2017 arising in the assessment order dated 21.12.2016 passed by the Assessing Officer under s. 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning A.Y. 2009-10.
As per the grounds of appeal, the assessee has challenged the action of CIT(A) in denying the exemptions claim under s. 11 & 12 on certain income.
Cricket Association vs. DC IT] A.Y. 2009-10 - 2 - 3. With the assistance of the Ld. AR for the assessee, we straightway notice that the revisional order passed under s. 263 by the CIT(E) dated 16.02.2016 which is the foundation for the assessment order passed under s. 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act dated 21.12.2016 was quashed by the Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT in dated 04.03.2019.
In view of the order of the Co-ordinate Bench whereby the revisional order under s. 263 does not survive any longer, the consequential assessment order passed in pursuance thereof which is subject matter of present appeal would automatically cease to survive and is rendered non-est. As a result, appeal of the assessee emanating from such consequential order under s. 143(3) r.w.s. 263 is rendered infructuous.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 25/07/2019
Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 25/07/2019 TANMAY TRUE COPY आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026