THE DCIT(EXEMPTIONS), CIR-1, AHMEDABAD vs. GUJARAT COUNCIL OF SCIENCE CITY., AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect of the appeal was below Rs. 50 lakhs, which is below the threshold for filing appeals as per CBDT Instruction No. 17 of 2019. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing the assessee to accumulate 15% of its income. The appeal was filed for the assessment year 2009-10.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal given the low tax effect, as per CBDT instructions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD - BENCH ‘B’
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of ld.CIT(A)- 9, Ahmedabad dated 20.11.2017 passed for the assessment year 2009-10.
The Revenue is aggrieved by the action of the Id.CIT(A) in allowing accumulation of @15% of Rs.1,13,33,972/- under section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
At the outset, when the Bench noticed that the tax effect on the disputed amount would be less than Rs.50 lakhs, it enquired with the ld.DR, whether appeal of the Revenue is hit by the latest CBDT Instruction No.17 of 2019 dated 8.8.2019, whereby Department has been instructed not to file appeal before the Tribunal where tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs, he did not dispute applicability of the recent CBDT circular and left to the Tribunal to pass appropriate order in the matter.
In view of the above, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue falls within the purview of the CBDT Instruction cited (supra) and therefore, keeping in view the above CBDT circular and provisions of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue deserves to be dismissed. It is dismissed.
However, it is observed that in case on re-verification at the end of the AO it can be demonstrated that the tax; effect is more, or Revenue's case falls within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular, then the Department will be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recall of this order. Such application should be filed within the time period prescribed in the Act. In view of the above, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect. Order pronounced in the Court on 15th October, 2019 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 11(1)(a)
- Sri Vidyanikethan Educational Trust… vs DCIT Exemption Cir, VijayawadaITA 412/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Porwal Charitable Trust, Thane vs The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 7604/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- The Somaiya Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 2(4)…ITA 4057/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Jain Citizen Education Society, Surendra… vs ITO, Ward-2, Exmp, AhmedabadITA 737/AHD/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Vanita Samaj, Mumbai vs Jurisdiction Exem Ward 2(4), MumbaiITA 8116/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026