THE DIVYA JYOTI SEVA SANSTHAN,PRATAPGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (E), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT erred by not examining the objects of the society and by rejecting the application ex-parte without affording a proper opportunity of hearing. The matter was restored to the CIT for re-adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under section 12A and approval under section 80G. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the applications without a proper hearing, citing lack of material on activities and inability to produce books of account and vouchers.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT properly examined the objects of the society and afforded due opportunity of hearing before rejecting the applications for registration and approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
PER A. D. JAIN, V.P.: These are assessee’s appeals against the orders of the ld. CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow, both dated 10/6/2019, rejecting the applications, for registration under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and grant of approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act.
The facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application for registration under section 12A(a) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 on 27/12/2018 with the CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow. The ld. CIT (Exemptions) issued a letter dated 22/5/2019 to the assessee calling for specific queries regarding its application for registration under section 12A of the Act, for compliance on 10/6/2019. On this date, i.e., 10/6/2019, neither anybody appeared b
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026