SHRI MANOJ SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7-1, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found that the assessee's Chartered Accountant had a reasonable cause for not appearing before the CIT(A). Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against an ex parte order of the CIT(A) was heard by the ITAT. The CIT(A) had confirmed the AO's assessment order, which included an addition of Rs. 5,10,618/- on account of long-term capital gain.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex parte order without providing a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “SMC”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAMESH C SHARMA, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 413/JP/2018
vkns'k@ ORDER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the ex parte order of ld.CIT(A), 3, Jaipur dated 05-02-2018 for the A.Y. 2008-09 in the matter of an assessment order passed u/s. 147/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act).
In this appeal the assessee specifically is aggrieved for re-opening of assessment as well as addition of Rs.5,10,618/- made on long term capital gain on sale of a plot.
Rival contentions have been heard and perused the record. I found that the ld. CIT(A) by ex parte order has confirmed the action of the AO. hearing, but, the Chartered Accountant of the assessee was busy with tax matter. Accordingly, he could not attend before the ld. CIT(A). An affidavit explaining the reasons for non-appearance before the ld. CIT(A) was filed. After going through the same, I found that there was reasonable cause for non appearance of the ld.AR before the ld.CIT(A).
In the substantial interest of justice, we restore the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for deciding the matter afresh after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee. I also direct the assessee to appear before the ld. CIT(A) within 60 days from the receipt of this Tribunal order. Grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd ….April, 2019.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026